Down With TAPS - For A Tobacco Free World
By Shobha Shukla, CNS
May 31, 2013
The author is the Managing Editor of Citizen News Service - CNS. She is a J2J Fellow of National Press Foundation (NPF) USA. She received her editing training in Singapore, has worked earlier with State Planning Institute, UP and taught physics at India's prestigious Loreto Convent. She also co-authored a book on childhood TB, childhood pneumonia, Hepatitis C Virus and HIV, and MDR-TB. Email: email@example.com, website: http://www.citizen-news.org
This year marks the 24th consecutive World No Tobacco Day (WNTD) in which the international community joins hands to bring attention to the tobacco industry’s underhanded tactics to thwart public health policy. The theme for World No Tobacco Day 2013 is: ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship with the view to curb tobacco industry’s aggressive tactics of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) to hook millions of new customers to this deadly product every year.
Tobacco accounts for 1 in 10 of all deaths globally, killing nearly 6 million people each year which include some 600,000 non-smokers who are exposed to second hand smoke. Globally there are around 1 billion smokers today, 2/3 of whom live in the following 15 low--‐ and middle--‐income countries (in order by number of smokers): China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Ukraine, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Poland. Without urgent action, deaths from tobacco could reach 8 million by 2030, more than 80% of which will be among people living in low- and middle-income countries.
Keeping in mind that tobacco is the single most preventable cause of death on planet earth today, the WHO unified the international community behind a global public health treaty, formally known as the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). The FCTC enshrines the world’s most effective tobacco control measures, and can save 200 million lives by 2050 if fully implemented. Article 5.3 of this treaty--which states that the tobacco industry has an irreconcilable conflict of interest with public health--is the backbone of the FCTC and the treaty cannot succeed if industry interference is not rooted out.
Also, a comprehensive ban of TAPS is required under Article 13 of the FCTC for all parties ratifying the treaty. Statistics show that the removal of TAPS alone can save lives by reducing tobacco consumption by an average of 7%. Yet, to date only 19 of the 176 signatory countries to FCTC have fully comprehensive bans on TAPS, thus fully protecting a mere 425 million people--6% of the world’s population--from exposure to the tobacco industry tactics.
The primary purpose of TAPS is to encourage youth to begin smoking and to keep current users hooked on to their deadly addiction. Children are three times more sensitive to tobacco marketing than adults and are more likely to be influenced to smoke by marketing than by their peers. In fact, almost 90% of smokers smoked their first cigarette before the age of 18, and almost 25% of these began smoking before the age of 10. Hence they form a primary target for the tobacco industry’s lethal marketing tactics. Eliminating Big Tobacco’s ability to market its deadly products can stop new users from joining the bandwagon, saving millions of lives in the process.
Dr Anne Jones, from The Union who also is the CEO of Action on Smoking and Health Australia, rightly believes that “the biggest challenge is ending the tobacco industry’s exploitation with a ban on their interference, political donations and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).
Big tobacco’s lethal marketing strategies date back to 1955 when Philip Morris, the producer of Marlboro cigarettes, introduced the image of the rugged cowboy—the famous Marlboro Man—which increased the sale of its filtered cigarettes by more than 3000% within one year. The Marlboro Man is an example of a global-marketing strategy that pushed Philip Morris International to become the industry leader. However, few will remember that two of the actors who portrayed the 'Marlboro Man' died of lung cancer. The first was Wayne McClaren in 1992 at the age of 51. He spent many years after his lung cancer diagnosis promoting an anti-smoking campaign. The second Marlboro Man who succumbed to lung cancer in 1995 was David McClean. His family later filed a suit against Phillip Morris, citing he had to smoke sometimes five packs of cigarettes a day in order to complete commercial filming and print ad shoots.
Even as more and more countries adopt stringent tobacco control laws, tobacco companies are investing huge amounts of money in sophisticated chicanery to promote their products through surrogate advertising, sponsorships of social events, and engaging in their so called CSR activities that are intended to improve their image as socially acceptable entities and persuade governments not to introduce policies that will reduce tobacco sales.
Recently, a local cigarette company in Jamaica-- Carreras Ltd-- launched 50 educational scholarships worth USD 6 million under the garb of its CSR activities. This is nothing short of a subtle cigarette promotion campaign aimed at ensnaring young college going students to a lifelong deadly habit and is rightly being opposed by tobacco control advocates. The company however has had the audacity to deny any advertisement motives for these awards, saying that they are simply giving back to society.
Nearer home, the Godfrey Phillips India Limited is one of the largest players in the Indian cigarette industry. It manufactures some of the most popular cigarette brands in the country like FS1, Four Square, Red and White, Cavanders, and also manufactures and distributes iconic brand Marlboro under a license agreement with Philip Morris. On the one hand it is jeopardizing the lives of millions of Indians by selling tobacco products (it reaped an estimated annual turnover of over INR 3200 crores in 2011-2012), while on the other hand it unashamedly professes to enrich and energize the society through its social responsibility initiatives like the annual Godfrey Phillips Bravery Awards which purport to honour the uncommon acts of physical valour, social service and humanitarian deeds of the common man. This year’s Awards were recently presented by Mr Kapil Sibal, Minister for Communication and IT and Bollywood actor –director Deepti Naval. Both of them are public figures and yet neither they nor the recipients thought it inappropriate to dance to the tunes of a poison peddling company by taking part in this farcical activity.
There seems to be a fundamental conflict of interest between the goals of the tobacco industry and goals of governments in promoting public health. In the words of Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization, “The tobacco industry behaves like a corrosive substance that can eat through, or seep through, any crack or fissure in the armour of our defences. Our response must be to seal all these cracks and fissures, one by one, with science and evidence, supported by instruments for applying this knowledge and backed by the rule of law.”
Tobacco industry interference has, time and again, weakened and delayed the enforcement of public health policies around the world. In India strong pictorial warnings on tobacco packs have been diluted and/or their implementation postponed several times in the past under immense lobbying from the tobacco industry. The Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare had admitted to the Central Information Commission that it is the tobacco industry pressure that is not letting it implement tobacco control health policies effectively.
The situation is worse in Indonesia where smoking kills more than 200,000 Indonesian annually and 70% of all Indonesian children less than 15 years of age are exposed to second hand smoke. According to Dr Tara Singh Bam, Technical Advisor, Tobacco Control, at the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), “Indonesia can be best described as an advertiser’s paradise, where tobacco industry’s marketing, advertising, promotion and sponsorship is rampant in its largely unrestricted regulatory environment, resulting in nearly 80% of Indonesian smokers start before the age of 19 years. Although it has ratified the FCTC still Indonesia’s tobacco control laws and regulations are completely blocked due to tobacco industry’s aggressive interferences.”
In Myanmar too enforcement of the country’s tobacco control law of 2006 is weak due to industry interference. Dr Bam informed that recently the Union has signed an agreement with the Ministry of Health of Myanmar to ensure complete ban of tobacco advertisements, promotion and sponsorship, and endorse WHO FCTC article 5.3 preventing tobacco industry interferences.
Dr Ehsan Latif, Director of Tobacco Control at the Union told Citizen News Service - CNS that, “Bloomberg Initiative (BI) grants in Bangladesh and Pakistan are assisting the respective governments to set up implementation infra-structures for tobacco control laws already in place in order that the benefits reach the communities. The BI grants for these countries have been strengthened and backed up by a robust capacity building programme which will lead to sustainability of these programmes. It is the responsibility of the governments to lead and fund tobacco control in their countries with a view to make the attainment of effective tobacco control much easier and sustainable in the years to come.”
The ultimate goal is to protect present and future generations not only from devastating health consequences, but also against the social, environmental and economic scourges of tobacco use and exposure to tobacco smoke. We have to work together to achieve a world free of tobacco-related addiction, death and disease.
--- Shared under Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License
Posted on: May 31, 2013 08:29 AM IST